What will it take to get you out of your car?
One of the main hobbyhorses obsessed over by transit advocates is the price of gasoline. When gas is cheap, we complain that it is supppressed by foreign policy and energy development tax credits to encourage sprawl and other waste. When gas is expensive, we whine that people aren't switching to transit as fast as they should given the relative costs of driving versus taking a bus, train or bike.
Yesterday, for the first time ever, I paid over $3 for a gallon of gas in what is certain to be one of very few additional gas purchases until prices get lower or I sell my car. However, when I pulled out of the gas station and into the street, the traffic was just as bad. Just how bad does it have to get before people clamor for transit in a serious way? Some have tried to puzzle it out:
At issue is "elasticity," the measure of how much demand changes with increases or decreases in price. Gasoline demand in the United States is relatively inelastic because drivers lack alternatives for transportation. According to studies cited in a 2001 Oregon Department of Transportation report, a 10 percent increase in the cost of gasoline will cause a decrease of about 1.5 percent in miles traveled. By comparison, research suggests a 10 percent increase in the price of cigarettes leads to a 2.8 percent to 4 percent drop in sales.
"The one problem with modeling elasticity for gasoline is that if you don't have a substitute, there won't be elasticity," said Jacob Bournazian, a retail gasoline expert with EIA. But over the long term, as new technologies are developed, commuters usually adapt. Options such as moving closer to a commuting destination or purchasing a more fuel-efficient vehicle may not be viable in the short term, but they become options as the time horizon expands, Bournazian said.
While some have predicted gasoline prices may reach nearly $3 in some regions during the peak summer driving season, even prices on the high end of the scale may not reduce driving or prompt consumers to buy new, more fuel-efficient cars, according to experts.
A recent survey by CNW Marketing Research said about one-third of drivers would consider buying a more efficient vehicle if fuel prices reached $3.25 a gallon. "It might seem that we have a good way to go before a significant chunk will consider changing their vehicle," said Robert Sinclair of the Automobile Association of America.
Well, premium at some Chicagoland locations is going for $3.25 and the increase in fuel costs is actually hurting the CTA because ridership isn't rising in any meaningful way to cover the higher price of diesel.
There is obviously a long way to go before habits change.
Post Author:
rj3 | 11:03 AM |
Link
|
TrackBacks
If anything, hopefully we'll see more alternative fuel-using buses. Miami Beach runs electric buses. DC and many cities have natural gas buses. Not sure if Compressed Natrual Gas is cheaper than diesel, though. Maybe these increases in fuel costs won't get to individual drivers for a while but the costs to businesses could drive new choices or push for more options.
I think CNG is cheaper now, but there's really no reason why it couldn't be just as expensive as diesel in the future and thus a bad investment. As for electric buses in Miami, they really suck. Slow, dinky-looking underused.
I think it's becoming more and more evident that people are willing to pay much more than we'd thought for the ability to go where they want, when they want to.
It isn't the gasoline price that's the determinant, it's perhaps difficulty in getting there (traffic) and the availability of parking when they do get there that are the motivations for taking mass transit.
Even in London with its $6/gallon gas prices, people continue to abandon the trains for their cars as their prosperity increases. It makes some sense in Manhattan to take the train because the cost of a parking space can equal the rent of a house in the suburbs.
We may have to face the fact that mass transit is simply the fallback to having a car. People don't really like it and would prefer to be on their own. And they're apparently willing to pay the price.
expensive personal transport is one thing, but for most people mass transit is not really convenient. Most areas are not densely developed enough (we are not talking Manhattan dense, just enough to support a bus line of good frequency). If where people live and where they work are too spread out to make group transit a viable time efficient option, it won't work unless personal transit becomes prohibitively expensive (which it is not yet).
maybe some years of expensive gas (= expensive personal transport) will raise some consciousness about current unsustainable building patterns, which are generally unsuitable for mass transit.
Green architecture is a big thing these days, but who cares if you build a "green" house if you have to drive 20 miles each way to get to it?